You don’t need every claim in InsightAdvocate on day one. Start where the money and the risk are — the large and disputed claims — keep every agent at draft, and let the answers your advocates give tell you what to trust.
identity, roles,
carriers and terms,
first controls"] --> C["Days 30-60
large and disputed
claims, Analyze,
people answer"] C --> R["Days 60-90
read agreement,
tune controls,
decide on the dial"]
A plan, not a benchmark: the durations are illustrative.
Days 1–30: the record
- Sign-in through your identity provider; the roster of advocates, account executives and practice leaders.
- Carriers with their service-agreement terms and escalation ladders. Confirm with counsel the regulatory timelines you want shown (they ship as illustrative models).
- Publish
NOTICE_OVERDUEandLARGE_DENIALfirst. They are the cheapest misses to stop.
Days 30–60: the claims
- Load the open large and disputed claims: policies and clauses, the carrier’s letters, the timeline, the loss schedule.
- Run Analyze. Advocates accept, reject or ask on every prepared decision. Every answer is evidence.
Days 60–90: read the evidence
- Agreement per agent and action on the autonomy page. Where advocates reject, read why.
- Which controls fired, and whether they should have. Change them in a draft; test before publishing.
- Whether to keep everything at draft, or let an agent ask first. The ceiling stays at L2.
What to measure
| Measure | From |
|---|---|
| Notices sent after their deadline | The notice engine |
| Days from a carrier letter to the broker’s response | The timeline |
| Positions challenged and how each resolved | The coverage assessments and outcomes |
| Carrier clocks met on time | The scorecard |
| Final recovery against the floor | The settlement outcome |
Write the definitions down before you start. We won’t quote improvement figures here: the only honest ones are the ones your practice measures.
